On 9/9/20 3:46 PM, Bin Meng wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 7:05 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >> >> On 9/9/20 3:55 AM, Bin Meng wrote: >>> Hi Marek, >> >> Hi, >> >>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:15 AM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 9/8/20 5:45 PM, Bin Meng wrote: >>>>> Hi Marek, >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 7:13 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/8/20 3:44 AM, Bin Meng wrote: >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 3:14 PM Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng....@mediatek.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Use readx_poll_sleep_timeout() to poll the register status >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng....@mediatek.com> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> v3: no changes >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> v2: fix typo of title suggested by Frank >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 25 +++++++++++-------------- >>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. So now I have half of a RESEND patchset with RB tags, and >>>>>> another half of just RB tags without patchset. Can someone of you please >>>>>> collect the tags and resend the patchset once more with the collected >>>>>> tags, so it's all in one place ? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I believe the latest version has all the RB tags. >>>> >>>> Thank you, I cannot apply a patchset which only has "Re:" in my mailbox, >>>> because the original patches are just not there. >>> >>> You can use patchwork to help the custodian work. I found it very >>> helpful to download the patches from patchwork and apply. >> >> Can you also comment on patches via patchwork ? >> >> I mean, really, can we please just stick to the usual workflow ? That's >> all I am asking for , nothing else, nothing new. > > I don't understand the question about "usual workflow". You asked "I > cannot apply a patchset which only has "Re:" in my mailbox" and I > recommended patchwork which will satisfy the requirement of what you > asked.
Right, I can, but if there is more I want to say about the patch, I cannot do it with patchwork. Then I need the patch, which I don't have. Hence my remark about the usual email-based workflow.