On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:02 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > On 9/9/20 3:46 PM, Bin Meng wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 7:05 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > >> > >> On 9/9/20 3:55 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > >>> Hi Marek, > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:15 AM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On 9/8/20 5:45 PM, Bin Meng wrote: > >>>>> Hi Marek, > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 7:13 PM Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 9/8/20 3:44 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 3:14 PM Chunfeng Yun > >>>>>>> <chunfeng....@mediatek.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Use readx_poll_sleep_timeout() to poll the register status > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng....@mediatek.com> > >>>>>>>> --- > >>>>>>>> v3: no changes > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> v2: fix typo of title suggested by Frank > >>>>>>>> --- > >>>>>>>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 25 +++++++++++-------------- > >>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks. So now I have half of a RESEND patchset with RB tags, and > >>>>>> another half of just RB tags without patchset. Can someone of you > >>>>>> please > >>>>>> collect the tags and resend the patchset once more with the collected > >>>>>> tags, so it's all in one place ? > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> I believe the latest version has all the RB tags. > >>>> > >>>> Thank you, I cannot apply a patchset which only has "Re:" in my mailbox, > >>>> because the original patches are just not there. > >>> > >>> You can use patchwork to help the custodian work. I found it very > >>> helpful to download the patches from patchwork and apply. > >> > >> Can you also comment on patches via patchwork ? > >> > >> I mean, really, can we please just stick to the usual workflow ? That's > >> all I am asking for , nothing else, nothing new. > > > > I don't understand the question about "usual workflow". You asked "I > > cannot apply a patchset which only has "Re:" in my mailbox" and I > > recommended patchwork which will satisfy the requirement of what you > > asked. > > Right, I can, but if there is more I want to say about the patch, I > cannot do it with patchwork. Then I need the patch, which I don't have. > Hence my remark about the usual email-based workflow.
Yes, that's true. If we need to post comments about patches, we will have to use email. Regards, Bin