Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1285828543.20234.5.ca...@ptyser-laptop> you wrote: > > The existing I2C_ADDR_LIST isn't documented, so I didn't document this > addition. I'll mention them both in doc/README.POST.
Thanks. What I don't understand yet: why do we need a balck (ignore) list at all, when we already have a white list (I2C_ADDR_LIST) ? Should not one be sufficient? > > Hmm.. as this is only used in post code, this should be visible > > in the defines name, what with: > > > > I2C_POST_ADDR_IGNORE_LIST > > I was following the lead of the existing I2C_ADDR_LIST define. Agreed > it should be named differently. I'll go with CONFIG_SYS_POST_I2C_ADDRS > and CONFIG_SYS_POST_I2C_IGNORES unless someone else chimes in. Argh... I don't like identifiers that need half a line or more... Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Bus error -- please leave by the rear door. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot