Dear Peter Tyser, In message <1285868400.28947.19878.ca...@petert> you wrote: > > So the IGNORE_LIST is intended for devices that may or may not be > > present, and neither state is considered an error? > > Correct. And also for devices that may or may not be present, but are > impossible to determine if they should/shouldn't be present, so its > impossible to determine what an error case is (if that makes sense...). > > I gave a few examples in the original patch of when this might be > useful. Most of the examples could be better solved by a more > complicated, dynamically generated I2C_ADDR_LIST (eg detect if an XMC > card is present, and if so, add device 0x50 to the list of expected > devices), but it seems like overkill for a simple POST.
Now I understand your intention. I didn't when reading the description in the initial commit message. Maybe you can make this a bit more explicit for slow thinkers like me. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Monday is an awful way to spend one seventh of your life. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
