> -----Original Message-----
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:05 PM
> To: Prafulla Wadaskar
> Cc: Rogan Dawes; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; 
> Prabhanjan Sarnaik
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] kirkwood: added common config 
> file mv-config.h
> 
> Le 30/09/2010 16:33, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit :
> 
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * IDe Support on SATA port0
> >>> + */
> >>
> >> IDe?
> >
> > I think Ide can be removed, right?

I mean here s/Ide//g

> 
> Do none of the boards have disks? At least openrd-base should 
> have IDE 

Guruplug, openrd_base and rd6281a have disk support

> (and openrd-client as well if the patch to introduced it is 
> finally merged).
> 
> So IDE should stay IMO, but the IDE stuff should be split into 
> board-specifics (basically the defines for the IDE0 and, if 
> it exists, 
> IDE1 base addresses) and SoC-specifics (basically everything 
> else, i.e. 
> all that is required for cmd_ide.c to compile).

At this moment I only see the case with edminiv2 board where ATA bus0 is 
configured for sata port1.
To extend this support for this board, we can undef and redef the respective 
macros.

Whereas on all other boards it is one-to-one mapping.

To me setting default configuration make more sense, that avoids code 
duplication in several files.

Regards..
Prafulla . .
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to