Dne petek, 22. januar 2021 ob 02:17:30 CET je Andre Przywara napisal(a):
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 21:11:40 +0100
> 
> Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skra...@siol.net> wrote:
> > H616 has mostly the same clocks as H6 with some small differences. Just
> > reuse H6 clocks for H616 and handle differences with macros.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <sam...@sholland.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skra...@siol.net>
> > ---
> > 
> >  .../include/asm/arch-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.h   | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> >  arch/arm/mach-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.c          |  8 ++++++--
> >  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.h
> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.h index
> > e83e84ab6cab..62abfc4ef6bd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.h
> > @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ struct sunxi_ccm_reg {
> > 
> >  #define CCM_PLL1_CTRL_EN           BIT(31)
> >  #define CCM_PLL1_LOCK_EN           BIT(29)
> >  #define CCM_PLL1_LOCK                      BIT(28)
> > 
> > +#define CCM_PLL1_OUT_EN                    BIT(27)
> > 
> >  #define CCM_PLL1_CLOCK_TIME_2              (2 << 24)
> >  #define CCM_PLL1_CTRL_P(p)         ((p) << 16)
> >  #define CCM_PLL1_CTRL_N(n)         ((n) << 8)
> > 
> > @@ -238,6 +239,7 @@ struct sunxi_ccm_reg {
> > 
> >  #define CCM_PLL5_CTRL_EN           BIT(31)
> >  #define CCM_PLL5_LOCK_EN           BIT(29)
> >  #define CCM_PLL5_LOCK                      BIT(28)
> > 
> > +#define CCM_PLL5_OUT_EN                    BIT(27)
> > 
> >  #define CCM_PLL5_CTRL_N(n)         ((n) << 8)
> >  #define CCM_PLL5_CTRL_DIV1(div1)   ((div1) << 0)
> >  #define CCM_PLL5_CTRL_DIV2(div0)   ((div0) << 1)
> > 
> > @@ -252,7 +254,6 @@ struct sunxi_ccm_reg {
> > 
> >  #define CCM_PLL6_CTRL_DIV1_MASK            (0x1 << 
CCM_PLL6_CTRL_DIV1_SHIFT)
> >  #define CCM_PLL6_CTRL_DIV2_SHIFT   1
> >  #define CCM_PLL6_CTRL_DIV2_MASK            (0x1 << 
CCM_PLL6_CTRL_DIV2_SHIFT)
> > 
> > -#define CCM_PLL6_DEFAULT           0xa0006300
> > 
> >  /* cpu_axi bit field*/
> >  #define CCM_CPU_AXI_MUX_MASK               (0x3 << 24)
> > 
> > @@ -262,6 +263,9 @@ struct sunxi_ccm_reg {
> > 
> >  #define CCM_CPU_AXI_AXI_MASK               0x3
> >  #define CCM_CPU_AXI_DEFAULT_FACTORS        0x301
> > 
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_SUN50I_H6
> > +#define CCM_PLL6_DEFAULT           0xa0006300
> > +
> > 
> >  /* psi_ahb1_ahb2 bit field */
> >  #define CCM_PSI_AHB1_AHB2_DEFAULT  0x03000102
> > 
> > @@ -270,6 +274,18 @@ struct sunxi_ccm_reg {
> > 
> >  /* apb1 bit field */
> >  #define CCM_APB1_DEFAULT           0x03000102
> > 
> > +#elif CONFIG_MACH_SUN50I_H616
> > +#define CCM_PLL6_DEFAULT           0xa8003100
> > +
> > +/* psi_ahb1_ahb2 bit field */
> > +#define CCM_PSI_AHB1_AHB2_DEFAULT  0x03000002
> 
> Why is this twice as fast, compared to the H6? It's based on the same
> PERI0(1X), which should be 600 MHz for both the H6 and H616, right?
> 
> Is that the reset config or set up by the BROM? Or is that coming from
> some BSP source?

Actually I just dumped register when Android was running.

Best regards,
Jernej

> 
> > +
> > +/* ahb3 bit field */
> > +#define CCM_AHB3_DEFAULT           0x03000002
> > +
> > +/* apb1 bit field */
> > +#define CCM_APB1_DEFAULT           0x03000102
> > +#endif
> > 
> >  /* apb2 bit field */
> >  #define APB2_CLK_SRC_OSC24M                (0x0 << 24)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.c index 6bd466915c11..daca02019bab
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/clock_sun50i_h6.c
> > @@ -68,6 +68,9 @@ void clock_set_pll1(unsigned int clk)
> > 
> >     /* clk = 24*n/p, p is ignored if clock is >288MHz */
> >     writel(CCM_PLL1_CTRL_EN | CCM_PLL1_LOCK_EN | CCM_PLL1_CLOCK_TIME_2 
|
> > 
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_SUN50I_H616
> > +          CCM_PLL1_OUT_EN |
> > +#endif
> > 
> >            CCM_PLL1_CTRL_N(clk / 24000000), &ccm->pll1_cfg);
> >     
> >     while (!(readl(&ccm->pll1_cfg) & CCM_PLL1_LOCK)) {}
> > 
> > @@ -83,6 +86,7 @@ unsigned int clock_get_pll6(void)
> > 
> >  {
> >  
> >     struct sunxi_ccm_reg *const ccm =
> >     
> >             (struct sunxi_ccm_reg *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
> > 
> > +   int m = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MACH_SUN50I_H6) 4 : 2;
> 
> This is missing the question mark, but that gets fixed up in a later
> patch, so I assume it's a rebase artifact. Will fix it up while
> committing.
> 
> Cheers,
> Andre
> 
> >     uint32_t rval = readl(&ccm->pll6_cfg);
> >     int n = ((rval & CCM_PLL6_CTRL_N_MASK) >> CCM_PLL6_CTRL_N_SHIFT);
> > 
> > @@ -90,8 +94,8 @@ unsigned int clock_get_pll6(void)
> > 
> >                     CCM_PLL6_CTRL_DIV1_SHIFT) + 1;
> >     
> >     int div2 = ((rval & CCM_PLL6_CTRL_DIV2_MASK) >>
> >     
> >                     CCM_PLL6_CTRL_DIV2_SHIFT) + 1;
> > 
> > -   /* The register defines PLL6-4X, not plain PLL6 */
> > -   return 24000000 / 4 * n / div1 / div2;
> > +   /* The register defines PLL6-2X or PLL6-4X, not plain PLL6 */
> > +   return 24000000 / m * n / div1 / div2;
> > 
> >  }
> >  
> >  int clock_twi_onoff(int port, int state)




Reply via email to