"Schwarz,Andre" <andre.schw...@matrix-vision.de> wrote on 2010/10/24 22:33:44: > > Wolfgang, > > Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> hat am 24. Oktober 2010 um 22:18 geschrieben: > > > Dear "Schwarz,Andre", > > > > In message <1702240919.111.1287950899754.javamail.open-xcha...@proteus> you > > wrote: > > > > > > Since I assume Wolfgang won't accept a board specific "add 4 nops after > > > _start"-patch I'd like to solve this without trial and error. > > > > To the best of my knowledge no board made use f this "warmboot" entry > > point. OK, I wasn't aware that Jocke obviously did something lioke > > this, so there might be other boards as well - but it's unlikely. > > > > > Of course digging into this is beyond my knowledge and any help would be > > > appreciated. > > > I simply can't think of being the only one having this issue... > > > > Check how your board implements the "reset" command - I cannot see any > > specific code for that in your sources, so it looks mostly harmless to > > me. > > this is what I don't understand : > > The broken boards are *dead*, i.e. no single character on the serial line. > To me this means even the initial code running from flash isn't executed > properly. > IMHO this doesn't look like something like a problem after relocation ... > it's something more fundamental.
Yes, like something is wrong with the reset code. > > The boards in question are using low boot, i.e. reset vector @ 0x100. Me too. > There's normal power-on-reset sequencing and no such thing like a reboot or > "warm" reset. > > Without that patch the boards are running fine. > > I can see no obvious difference between working and broken boards. > > I'd be happy to hear that the error is caused by something hidden within > board specific code. You still haven't reported weather the 4 nop's helped or not, yet you seek my help. I am just going to ignore you until you do test it. Jocke _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
