Hi, On 6/16/21 5:26 PM, Zhengxun Li wrote: > Hi Sean, > > Thank you for your reply. > > Sean Anderson <sean.ander...@seco.com> 於 2021年6月15日 週二 下午2:52寫道: >> >> >> >> On 6/15/21 1:21 PM, Zhengxun Li wrote: >> > Hi Michal, >> > >> > Sean Anderson <sean.ander...@seco.com> 於 2021年6月11日 週五 下午3:07寫道: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 6/11/21 11:10 AM, Zhengxun wrote: >> >> > Add the devicetree binding for the xilinx clocking wizard. >> >> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Zhengxun <zhengxunli.m...@gmail.com> >> >> > --- >> >> > .../clock/xlnx,clocking-wizard.txt | 43 >> +++++++++++++++++++ >> >> > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) >> >> > create mode 100644 >> doc/device-tree-bindings/clock/xlnx,clocking-wizard.txt >> >> >> >> Should this be .yml? In general, I believe we only need to document >> >> bindings in U-Boot if they differ from Linux. In Linux, I see that >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/xlnx,clocking-wizard.txt exists. >> >> Because the binding is documented in Linux, we do not need to document >> it in U-Boot. >> >> >> Will you be upstreaming this conversion to yaml? >> >> This patch documents the binding in yaml. However, the version in Linux >> is in old-style txt. Will you be sending a patch to Linux to convert >> this binding to yaml? > > In linux, I saw Shubhrajyoti Datta do this, although it has not been > accepted yet. The link is below. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-clk/patch/1617886723-27117-2-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti.da...@xilinx.com/ > > Should I do this again?
I prefer not to do it. Linux binding will be reviewed by Rob and that should be enough. Thanks, Michal