Hi, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> 於 2021年6月16日 週三 上午10:05寫道: > > Hi, > > On 6/16/21 5:26 PM, Zhengxun Li wrote: > > Hi Sean, > > > > Thank you for your reply. > > > > Sean Anderson <sean.ander...@seco.com> 於 2021年6月15日 週二 下午2:52寫道: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 6/15/21 1:21 PM, Zhengxun Li wrote: > >> > Hi Michal, > >> > > >> > Sean Anderson <sean.ander...@seco.com> 於 2021年6月11日 週五 下午3:07寫道: > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 6/11/21 11:10 AM, Zhengxun wrote: > >> >> > Add the devicetree binding for the xilinx clocking wizard. > >> >> > > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Zhengxun <zhengxunli.m...@gmail.com> > >> >> > --- > >> >> > .../clock/xlnx,clocking-wizard.txt | 43 > >> +++++++++++++++++++ > >> >> > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) > >> >> > create mode 100644 > >> doc/device-tree-bindings/clock/xlnx,clocking-wizard.txt > >> >> > >> >> Should this be .yml? In general, I believe we only need to document > >> >> bindings in U-Boot if they differ from Linux. In Linux, I see that > >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/xlnx,clocking-wizard.txt > >> exists. > >> > >> Because the binding is documented in Linux, we do not need to document > >> it in U-Boot. > >> > >> >> Will you be upstreaming this conversion to yaml? > >> > >> This patch documents the binding in yaml. However, the version in Linux > >> is in old-style txt. Will you be sending a patch to Linux to convert > >> this binding to yaml? > > > > In linux, I saw Shubhrajyoti Datta do this, although it has not been > > accepted yet. The link is below. > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-clk/patch/1617886723-27117-2-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti.da...@xilinx.com/ > > > > Should I do this again? > > I prefer not to do it. Linux binding will be reviewed by Rob and that > should be enough.
Thank you for your reply. Thanks, Zhengxun