On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Sughosh Ganu <urwithsugh...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > > On Wed Oct 27, 2010 at 11:22:17AM +0300, Darius Augulis wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Sughosh Ganu <urwithsugh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: > >> > >> > Not sure which core are you referring to. I checked for arm926ejs, >> > and we have conditional code inclusion based on the definition of >> > CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC. So the start address in both the cases >> > is determined based on whether relocation is enabled or not. >> >> The same is at least for arm926ejs, arm1136, arm1176. >> As you probably know CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC support will be >> removed soon and I'm talking about code which is under >> #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC. > > Umm. I am not sure i get you here. If CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC > is not defined, it means we have enabled relocation, so all the > address calculation should be w.r.t the relocation address.
No, there could be several different relocation methods - with and without preloader etc. There is another definition CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT which changes boot sequence dramatically. And it isn't CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC dependent. Darius. > > -sughosh > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot