Dear Daniel Hobi, Am 09.11.2010 um 19:24 schrieb Daniel Hobi: > And on many ARM platforms (including Kirkwood), the timer implementation > is still accessing BSS variables before relocation. > > Is someone working on this? Candidates are: > > $ git grep "static ulong timestamp" > arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx31/timer.c:static ulong timestamp; > arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/omap24xx/timer.c:static ulong timestamp; > arch/arm/cpu/arm1176/tnetv107x/timer.c:static ulong timestamp; > arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/interrupts.c:static ulong timestamp; > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/a320/timer.c:static ulong timestamp; > arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/timer.c:static ulong timestamp;
arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91rm9200/ is dead an will be removed soon. arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91/ still misses such an implementation but will be something like arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/ BTW couldn't the stuff in #ifdef CONFIG_AT91FAMILY in global_data generalized in some way to be used for all arm boards? regards Andreas Bießmann _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
