> -----Original Message----- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Premi, Sanjeev > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 7:56 PM > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Build failures with older toolchain > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Premi, Sanjeev > > Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 8:38 PM > > To: Wolfgang Denk > > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Build failures with older toolchain > > > > [snip]...[snip] > > > > > > > > > I am process of downloading the 2009q3 version from > > > codesourcery > > > > Albert mentioned he is using it. Are you on the same > > version as > > > > well? > > > > > > No, I'm using ELDk 4.2 > > > > [sp] Okay, so I downloaded both 2009-q3 and 2010.09-50 > versions of the > > Codesourcery Lite edition. > > > > There is no difference in the observations between > > 2009q3 and 2010q1. > >
[snip]...[snip] There were some good patches posted recently esp the bss_debug tool and fix for ARM relocation from Andreas. Applied them in order to get more information. In addition, added print indicating the function being called in for (init_funcptr= ....) loop within board_init_f(). Also added a print in the function omap3_evm_get_revision() just to see if it ever gets called in due to incorrect sequencing. I could confirm that functions in init_sequence[] are called and omap3_evm_get_revision() is not called in this sequence. When everything failed, I went back to the u-boot.lds and changed the way overlay is defined. ...AND PROBLEM SEEMS TO BE SOLVED! I can now compile u-boot with both 2009q1 and 2010q1 without any error. (yet to try with 2010.09) To verify, I wanted to do a before-and-after comparison but couldn't have done for the omap3_evm - used omap3_beagle instead. I haven't yet tried running the binary on the board; but here are top level observations: 1) .bss and .rel.dyn are starting at same address. 2) The size of .rodata has increased. (Why? not yet spent time on?) Sending the patch in next few mins: ~sanjeev (Comparison: "<before" and ">after") 753c753 < .rodata 0x80035578 0x9f38 --- > .rodata 0x80035578 0x9f46 757c757 < .rodata 0x8003571c 0xbc arch/arm/lib/libarm.o --- === [contents deleted] === < .u_boot_cmd 0x80041aac 0x658 --- > .u_boot_cmd 0x80041abc 0x658 === [contents deleted] === 967,968c967,973 < .rel.dyn 0x80042104 0x5af0 < 0x80042104 __rel_dyn_start = . --- > .dynsym 0x80042114 0xa0 > 0x80042114 __dynsym_start = . > *(.dynsym) > .dynsym 0x80042114 0xa0 arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o > > .rel.dyn 0x800421b4 0x5af0 > 0x800421b4 __rel_dyn_start = . === [contents deleted] === 984,985c986,987 < .bss 0x80042104 0x31ba8 < 0x80042104 __bss_start = . --- > .bss 0x800421b4 0x31bb4 load address 0x80047ca4 > 0x80073d68 __bss_start = . === [contents deleted] === < .dynbss 0x80073cac 0x0 --- > .dynbss 0x80073d68 0x0 load address 0x80079858 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
