Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message <201012080444.30675.vap...@gentoo.org> you wrote:
>
> unless i'm missing something, the non-reentrant versions operate on a single
> shared hash table. so while this works today because there is only one
Correct.
> consumer (the env code), wont this cause problems as soon as someone else
> tries to use the non-reentrant hash table code ? as such, wouldnt it make
> sense to punt all of the non-reentrant versions and thus force everyone to
> maintain their own "struct hsearch_data" instance ?
This could be done, but I don't see an immediate need.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
I've already got a female to worry about. Her name is the Enterprise.
-- Kirk, "The Corbomite Maneuver", stardate 1514.0
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
