El Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:15:52PM +0200, Quentin Schulz deia:
> From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@theobroma-systems.com>
> 
> While technically not a bug, let's have some consistency in paths
> returned by u-boot,spl-boot-order look-up and the one saved in
> u-boot,spl-boot-device by syncing spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices
> node paths.
> 
> Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+ub...@0leil.net>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@theobroma-systems.com>
> ---


Tested on a Rock-Pi-4B and didn't see any regression.
Tested-by: Xavier Drudis Ferran <xdru...@tinet.cat>
Reviewed-by: Xavier Drudis Ferran <xdru...@tinet.cat>


>  arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> index f280cb1dbf..7147dc09f5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ const char *spl_decode_boot_device(u32 boot_device)
>       } spl_boot_devices_tbl[] = {
>               { BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2, "/mmc@fe320000" },
>               { BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1, "/mmc@fe330000" },
> -             { BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000" },
> +             { BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000/flash@0" },
>       };
>  
>       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(spl_boot_devices_tbl); ++i)
> -- 
> 2.36.1
> 

Reply via email to