Hi Rasmus, On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 00:41, Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villem...@prevas.dk> wrote: > > On 10/10/2022 17.18, Tom Rini wrote: > > While it is possible and documented on how to re-run buildman to replace > > faked required binary files after the fact, this behavior ends up being > > more confusing than helpful in practice. Switch to requiring > > BINMAN_ALLOW_MISSING=1 to be passed on the 'make' line to enable this > > behavior. > > Recreating the bitbake scenario that bit me with this applied correctly > failed to build. Thanks. > > Tested-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villem...@prevas.dk>
If you have time, can you try this one instead (or the series): https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20221010200032.73483-5-...@chromium.org/ Regards, Simon
