Hi,

On 30/08/22 11:50 am, Jit Loon Lim wrote:
> From: Chee Hong Ang <chee.hong....@intel.com>
> 
> QSPI driver perform chip select on every flash read/write
> access. The driver need to disable/enable the QSPI controller
> while performing chip select. This may cause some data lost
> especially the QSPI controller is configured to run at slower
> speed as it may take longer time to access the flash device.
> This patch prevent the driver from disable/enable the QSPI
> controller too soon and inadvertently halting any ongoing flash
> read/write access by ensuring the QSPI controller is always in
> idle mode after each read/write access.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chee Hong Ang <chee.hong....@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/spi/cadence_qspi_apb.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi_apb.c b/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi_apb.c
> index 2cdf4c9c9f..5e03495f45 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi_apb.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/cadence_qspi_apb.c
> @@ -858,13 +858,9 @@ cadence_qspi_apb_indirect_read_execute(struct 
> cadence_spi_plat *plat,
>       writel(CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTRD_DONE,
>              plat->regbase + CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTRD);
>  
> -     /* Check indirect done status */
> -     ret = wait_for_bit_le32(plat->regbase + CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTRD,
> -                             CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTRD_DONE, 0, 10, 0);
> -     if (ret) {
> -             printf("Indirect read clear completion error (%i)\n", ret);
> -             goto failrd;
> -     }

Why would you drop looking at CQSPI_REG_INDIRECTRD_DONE status bit? This
gives out a much granular error wrt what operation actually failed.


> +     /* Wait til QSPI is idle */
> +     if (!cadence_qspi_wait_idle(plat->regbase))
> +             return -EIO;
>  
>       return 0;
>  
> @@ -1031,6 +1027,11 @@ cadence_qspi_apb_indirect_write_execute(struct 
> cadence_spi_plat *plat,
>  
>       if (bounce_buf)
>               free(bounce_buf);
> +
> +     /* Wait til QSPI is idle */
> +     if (!cadence_qspi_wait_idle(plat->regbase))
> +             return -EIO;
> +
>       return 0;
>  
>  failwr:

Reply via email to