On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 03:45:17PM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: > Hi Kever, > On 2023-04-20 13:10, Jonas Karlman wrote: > > Hi Kever, > > On 2023-04-20 12:19, Kever Yang wrote: > >> Hi Tom, > >> > >> I got error report like below log when apply many of this patchset with > >> "git-pw patch apply 1770392", > >> > >> did you met this kind of issue and do you know why? > > > > There are some interdependence in different incoming rockchip series, > > I have seen similar issue due to conflicts applying rk patches locally. > > Look like this patch was conflicting with [1]. This patch also include a > change how the mmc->clock is used. I have not been able to reproduce the > issue described in [1] with this series. > > Will send a rebased v3 of just this patch, remaining patches in this > series apply cleanly on top of your master branch after the conflict in > this patch is resolved.
In general, I've found using "b4 am" with "git am" to be better than patchwork directly, for the case where a full new series has been re-spun and re-posted, and I also don't want to just make a patchwork bundle for what I'm applying. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
