On 11/15/23 4:10 AM, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
Reduce redundancy in code by using templates to generate the A72 boot
binaries (tispl.bin and u-boot.img) as well as R5 boot binary sysfw.itb
(for legacy boot following devices J721E and AM65x).

Signed-off-by: Neha Malcom Francis <n-fran...@ti.com>
---
  arch/arm/dts/k3-am625-sk-binman.dtsi          | 157 +--------
  .../dts/k3-am625-verdin-wifi-dev-binman.dtsi  | 155 +-------
  arch/arm/dts/k3-am62a-sk-binman.dtsi          | 158 +--------
  arch/arm/dts/k3-am64x-binman.dtsi             | 151 +-------
  arch/arm/dts/k3-am65x-binman.dtsi             | 273 +-------------
  arch/arm/dts/k3-j7200-binman.dtsi             | 159 +--------
  arch/arm/dts/k3-j721e-binman.dtsi             | 332 +-----------------
  arch/arm/dts/k3-j721s2-binman.dtsi            | 157 +--------
  8 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 1488 deletions(-)

1488 deletions, nice!

Minor question, why was `ti-secure` not factored out of `dm` nodes like
it was for `atf`/`tee` nodes? Guessing it has to do with not all SoCs
needing this blob and signing nothing results in something, which
messes up the 0 size check when loading it, but it wasn't clear to me.

Anyway,

Acked-by: Andrew Davis <a...@ti.com>

Reply via email to