On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:11:03 +0200 Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote:
> Dear Scott Wood, > > In message <20110406233136.ga13...@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > Currently, some linker scripts are found by common code in config.mk. > > Some are found using CONFIG_SYS_LDSCRIPT, but the code for that is > > sometimes in arch config.mk and sometimes in board config.mk. Some > > are found using an arch-specific rule for looking in CPUDIR, etc. > > > > Further, the powerpc config.mk rule relied on CONFIG_NAND_SPL > > when it really wanted CONFIG_NAND_U_BOOT -- which covered up the fact > > that not all NAND_U_BOOT builds actually wanted CPUDIR/u-boot-nand.lds. > > > > Replace all of this -- except for a handful of boards that are actually > > selecting a linker script in a unique way -- with centralized ldscript > > finding. > > Thanks for this nice cleanup. > > Only one question: Which boards / architectures did you cover during > your tests? As I noted, I did a MAKEALL ppc and all the output (sizes, errors, etc) was the same as before the patch. I tried a few arm boards, and all the ones I tried failed the same way they did before the patch. I don't have toolchains for the other arches readily available. Any help in testing this change on non-ppc would be appreciated. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot