On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 01:36:09PM -0600, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 02:31:13PM +0300, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
>
> > From: Michael Polyntsov <michael.polynt...@iopsys.eu>
> >
> > If hardware (or driver) doesn't support leds blinking, it's
> > now possible to use software implementation of blinking instead.
> > This relies on cyclic functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Polyntsov <michael.polynt...@iopsys.eu>
> > Signed-off-by: Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevets...@iopsys.eu>
> > ---
> > drivers/led/Kconfig | 9 ++
> > drivers/led/led-uclass.c | 190 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 195 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> As one of those "well, hunh" kind of moment, I'm cc'ing Christian
> Marangi who also just posted patches foor this kind of functionality.
>
Eh... Well this implementation is better. I had the idea of adding
support on the uclass level but I preferred to limit it only to GPIO.
Think this would match how it's done in upstream linux kernel so I think
mine should be ignored and this taken (for sw blink).
Should not change a thing for the series since all the bits were using
generic LED functions.
--
Ansuel
