Hi Marek, > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] imx: Kconfig: make IMX8_ROMAPI > configurable > > On 10/6/24 11:23 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 07:31:16AM +0800, [email protected] > wrote: > > > >> From: Peng Fan <[email protected]> > >> > >> Make CONFIG_IMX8_ROMAPI could be configured in defconfig. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]> > >> Signed-off-by: Alice Guo <[email protected]> > >> Reviewed-by: Ye Li <[email protected]> > >> --- > >> arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 3 ++- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach- > imx/Kconfig > >> index 134e42028c..9d3aafd2f8 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > >> @@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ config DDRMC_VF610_CALIBRATION > >> the ddrmc_cr_setting on relevant board file. > >> > >> config IMX8_ROMAPI > >> - def_bool y > >> + bool "Enable i.MX ROMAPI" > >> + default y > >> depends on IMX8MN || IMX8MP || IMX8ULP || IMX9 > > > > Since there's no help here, is this truly configurable, or is this > > something that should be select'd based on the SoC and presumably > some > > of the newer IMX9 parts cannot use this? > I can imagine the MX95 calls into this custom ELE firmware stuff > instead of ROMAPI ?
True. i.MX95 A55 code no need ROMAPI. But it is still good to make this option configurable, because there is case that people no need romapi. Regards, Peng.
