On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 11:46:03AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tom Rini <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 6:51 AM > > To: Marek Vasut <[email protected]> > > Cc: Alice Guo (OSS) <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected]; dl-uboot-imx <uboot- > > [email protected]>; Peng Fan <[email protected]>; Ross, Fedor > > <[email protected]>; Ye Li <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > > Alice Guo <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] imx: Kconfig: make IMX8_ROMAPI > > configurable > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 12:28:44AM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > On 10/6/24 11:23 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Sun, Oct 06, 2024 at 07:31:16AM +0800, > > [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > > From: Peng Fan <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > Make CONFIG_IMX8_ROMAPI could be configured in defconfig. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alice Guo <[email protected]> > > > > > Reviewed-by: Ye Li <[email protected]> > > > > > --- > > > > > arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig | 3 ++- > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach- > > imx/Kconfig > > > > > index 134e42028c..9d3aafd2f8 100644 > > > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig > > > > > @@ -179,7 +179,8 @@ config DDRMC_VF610_CALIBRATION > > > > > the ddrmc_cr_setting on relevant board file. > > > > > config IMX8_ROMAPI > > > > > - def_bool y > > > > > + bool "Enable i.MX ROMAPI" > > > > > + default y > > > > > depends on IMX8MN || IMX8MP || IMX8ULP || IMX9 > > > > > > > > Since there's no help here, is this truly configurable, or is this > > > > something that should be select'd based on the SoC and > > presumably > > > > some of the newer IMX9 parts cannot use this? > > > I can imagine the MX95 calls into this custom ELE firmware stuff > > > instead of ROMAPI ? > > > > Alright. Perhaps this should be depending on the above and !main-ELE- > > symbol instead. > > Nope. To i.MX93, ELE and ROMAPI are both valid. There is case that > ROMAPI needs to be false while ELE is still true.
Alright, but where is the choice made? As in, can a normal i.MX93 board use one or the other, or will it depend on specific SoCs in the family? And is disabling this option even valid on the i.MX8 families? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
