Hi Detlev, > Just a probably dumb side question, but will ATAGS be deprecated once we > have the flat device tree also on ARM? As I understand, fdt is certainly > the way to go forward, so maybe we can already start with that? In that > case, the fdt blob will be another binary blob to be passed to the > kernel and as such should be independant of U-Boot. So ideally in > U-Boot we have a pointer to the fdt but the fdt itself can be updated > independantly.
I also thought about that. But I actually thought that FDT support for ARM isn't ready yet - although I saw much code for it while I worked on ATAGS. How is the FDT-state for ARM? If it is already usable I would be happy to adapt it. But if not I would prefer to stay with ATAGS (as I have a tight schedule for my BA thesis). Thx for your comment! Regards Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
