On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Simon Schwarz <simonschwarz...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Addition: As I read a bit about FDT it does not replace ATAGS > (http://elinux.org/Device_Trees) - it is more a supplement to it. So > it would not harm to implement minimal ATAGS support and later add the > FDT to it.
That was true in an early prototype, but it is not actually true anymore. Passing a DT replaces ATAGs on arm now, and that code is in mainline. > > I started a prototype for ATAGS creation by modifying bootm.c - which > seems (so long) not be too hard. If this works and doesn't add too > much overhead FDT support is not that much a problem IMHO. > > Regards > Simon > > (Sorry Detlev for the repost - forgot the ML...) > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot