On 10/9/25 17:26, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 12:48:29PM +0300, Eugen Hristev wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/26/25 18:31, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> The way that the NAND driver under DM_NAND_ATMEL is probed is by the
>>> dummy memory driver controlled by ATMEL_EBI. Rather than require that
>>> for NAND to work both be enabled, make NAND select ATMEL_EBI and do not
>>> prompt for ATMEL_EBI as it only triggers the probe for NAND.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> Cc: Eugen Hristev <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Dario Binacchi <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Michael Trimarchi <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/memory/Kconfig | 2 +-
>>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/memory/Kconfig b/drivers/memory/Kconfig
>>> index eaee739c6aab..591d9d9c6569 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/memory/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/memory/Kconfig
>>> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ config MEMORY
>>> For now this uclass has no methods yet.
>>>
>>> config ATMEL_EBI
>>> - bool "Support for Atmel EBI"
>>> + bool
>>> help
>>> Driver for Atmel EBI controller. This is a dummy
>>> driver. Doesn't provide an access to EBI controller. Select
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig
>>> index aa4bb2a0595c..f083113486ed 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/Kconfig
>>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ config SYS_NAND_NO_SUBPAGE_WRITE
>>> config DM_NAND_ATMEL
>>> bool "Support Atmel NAND controller with DM support"
>>> depends on ARCH_AT91
>>
>> Which branch is this patch based on ?
>> I have a conflict because this line ^^ is missing in master ("depends on
>> ARCH_AT91")
>> Is there another patch for that ?
>
> Ugh, yes, sorry, this patch depends on:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/[email protected]/
>
Then maybe Dario can pick this up together with the dependency patch ?
