On Thursday, July 14, 2011 05:14:07 Helmut Raiger wrote: > On 07/13/2011 01:46 PM, Detlev Zundel wrote: > >> The NDEBUG approach however, as Mike suggested, was what I was > >> looking for in the first place. > > Again, not so great. U-boot uses all kinds of assert(), BUG_ON(), > ASSERT() all over the place. > This probably needs a project wide effort, which is why I simply threw > in my NULL pointer check.
we tend to look at the long term picture with the best/correct solution rather than one-offs which get thrown away in the end -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
