On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 07:56:26PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 4:42 PM Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > OK. FWIW, I can't reproduce those linker messages about ".sdram" and > > ".sram", even when I point ROCKCHIP_TPL at the right binary file (per > > the docs). > > I only see these messages if I force SPL_SEPARATE_BSS. > > The board boots despite these messages.
So with SEPARATE_BSS the dtb is found where it's expected to be? But that then brings us back to what I'm saying.. > > I think you need to figure out where the mismatch is between where the > > device tree is appended in the binary, and where it's expected to be, in > > the binary, and then why something is writing it to the incorrect spot. > > At run time, in xPL (and this is lib/fdtdec.c) we look at either > > _image_binary_end if SEPARATE_BSS is enabled, or __bss_end if not. > > Looking at the config, I see we are not SEPARATE_BSS here, so it needs > > to be at __bss_end. And in both works and fails branches (my own quick > > rebase -q origin/master), for me, __bss_end is the same location. > > The dtb is placed at shifted-by-4 offset after the commit in Subject line: What's appending the dtb there? With SPL_SEPARATE_BSS off it needs to be at __bss_end, and that's the same location for me, in both cases. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
