Wolfgang, On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > Dear Stefan, > > In message <201107251711.21381...@denx.de> you wrote: >> >> I also don't have access to an 460SX board. And yes, perhaps its best to >> split >> the code now (460EX/GT vs. 460SX). >> >> Marri, what do you think? Perhaps you could test the resulting code on an SX >> board? > > It appears the Redwood board is unmaintained. No updates for this > board have ever been posted since the initial addition more than 3 > years ago, nor is there any board maintainer registered. > > I suggest we simply drop support for the unmaintained processor > and remove the respective board code from the tree. > > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk
I know that the SX variant is actively maintained on the Linux PPC mailing list, perhaps we just need to find a maintainer for the SX in u-boot? If the old code path was working for them, it wouldn't be any real work for me to keep it. Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
