Dear Anton Staaf,

In message <CAF6FioXcAAP=QOF3a5s_L6zUB5ArEUAQYutruAx=bpmt7rg...@mail.gmail.com> 
you wrote:
>
> I believe it is correct yes.  But it would be good to have each
> architecture custodian
> weigh in on the architectures I couldn't test directly.  Also, Mike
> has submitted a
> patch that adds the asm/cache.h file for blackfin from the Linux
> kernel.  This patch
> obsoletes one of the patches in my series.  My thinking is that we
> should wait a bit to
> hear from other custodians, and then I'll send a second version of the
> patch set that
> addresses any comments.  But I am also pretty confident that we could submit 
> the
> existing patch set (minus the blackfin asm/cache.h patch) and we would be 
> safe.

OK. so I'll wait for your next version patch set.  Thanks!!

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
"The more data I punch in this card,  the lighter it becomes, and the
lower the mailing cost."
                     - Stan Kelly-Bootle, "The Devil's DP Dictionary"
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to