On Monday 10 October 2011 13:44:21 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > See the rest of the thread. I had applied this patch set to a loal > > > tree, but it was breaking hundreds of systems, so had to back out the > > > patches again. > > > > > > I'm eager to get this code in myself, but it needs to be compile-clean > > > at least and harmless to all boards that don't actually reference that > > > code. > > > > sorry, but the rest of what thread ? i missed that there were issues and > > was wondering why they weren't in the published master branch yet ... > > There are actually three parts to this storey: > > Thisi s the original patch series, which I applied to a local test > branch with the intention to pull into mainline: > > 10/04 Anton Staaf [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] Add cache line alignment > support http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/111026 > > Then I noticed that this broke all PPC4xx boards, and asked Stefan to > fix this problem. Stefan did: > > 10/07 Stefan Roese [PATCH 1/2] ppc: Include <asm/cache.h> in common.h > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/111482 > > When PPC was building again, I tested it on ARM (which I assumed was > OK, given that this was Anton's primary architecture). That was when > I finally gave up, see > > 10/09 To:Anton Staaf Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/7] Add cache line > alignment support > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/111713
blah, this is the one e-mail in that thread that went into my trash somehow. i'll follow up in the original posting; thanks. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
