Dear Vadim Bendebury, In message <cany1buj0mhpdy948c+pm6u4eswtohw3+-u+m_fnig3bztbi...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote: > > because this chip is sensitive to the access cycle size (byte versus word). > > When using macros one can rely on the passed in pointer type to decide > which access to use (byte vs word). If using inline functions, there > would be two separate functions required for read (byte and u32) and > write (byte and u32).
This would then be an improvement in the code, as we then can see what the code is actually doing. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de What the gods would destroy they first submit to an IEEE standards committee. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
