Dear Wolfgang Denk, On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > Dear Vadim Bendebury, > > In message > <cany1buj0mhpdy948c+pm6u4eswtohw3+-u+m_fnig3bztbi...@mail.gmail.com> you > wrote: >> >> because this chip is sensitive to the access cycle size (byte versus word). >> >> When using macros one can rely on the passed in pointer type to decide >> which access to use (byte vs word). If using inline functions, there >> would be two separate functions required for read (byte and u32) and >> write (byte and u32). > > This would then be an improvement in the code, as we then can see > what the code is actually doing. >
please see the latest patch (v5) which addresses the chip representation and register access wrapper comments. cheers, /vb > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > > -- > DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel > HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany > Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de > What the gods would destroy they first submit to an IEEE standards > committee. > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
