On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 18:41, Simon Glass wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 18:01, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Simon Glass wrote: >>>> isn't it intended that env variables without a leading 0x in the value >>>> be interpreted as hex still? Iwc do I really want the 0x? >>> >>> Yes, this is intended. No, we do NOT want to see the 0x in such >>> cases. >> >> ok, so we'll want to stick with %x like you already have Simon. i >> disagree, but not enough to fight over it ;). > > OK. But I can use %p if you don't send your patch. How about %#p to > display 0x? It would be incompatible with glibc, but seems more > sensible. Then we could use this in quite a few places in U-Boot I > suspect.
i think wolfgang's point is that he doesn't want "0x" in env vars. i don't think he made any statement about %p in general. also, %#p works the same under u-boot as under glibc. it's just that %#p generates a gcc warning. -mike _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot