Hi Stephen, On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> wrote: > Thierry Reding wrote at Monday, November 14, 2011 6:22 AM: >> If a board configuration file redefines CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE, the U-Boot >> build system will usually define it explicitly on the compiler command- >> line, which will cause the define in tegra2-common.h to emit a >> redefinition warning. >> >> To allow boards to redefine CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE, tegra2-common.h now >> only defines CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE when it isn't already defined by the >> board configuration or the command-line respectively. > > Instead of doing this, wouldn't it make sense to just switch all Tegra > boards to TEXT_BASE=00108000 to match NVIDIA's flashing tool's assumptions? > That way, no board would need to override TEXT_BASE at all. > > These assumptions are true for all boards in the standard flashing tool > builds; it's just that non-standard builds exist for some boards (those > that happened to be upstreamed to U-Boot first) that allow use of 00e08000 > instead. > > Tom, Simon, what are your thoughts here?
I was going to say the same thing. Regards, Simon > > -- > nvpublic > > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot