On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Thierry Reding <thierry.red...@avionic-design.de> wrote: > * Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> wrote: >> > Thierry Reding wrote at Monday, November 14, 2011 6:22 AM: >> >> If a board configuration file redefines CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE, the U-Boot >> >> build system will usually define it explicitly on the compiler command- >> >> line, which will cause the define in tegra2-common.h to emit a >> >> redefinition warning. >> >> >> >> To allow boards to redefine CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE, tegra2-common.h now >> >> only defines CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE when it isn't already defined by the >> >> board configuration or the command-line respectively. >> > >> > Instead of doing this, wouldn't it make sense to just switch all Tegra >> > boards to TEXT_BASE=00108000 to match NVIDIA's flashing tool's assumptions? >> > That way, no board would need to override TEXT_BASE at all. >> > >> > These assumptions are true for all boards in the standard flashing tool >> > builds; it's just that non-standard builds exist for some boards (those >> > that happened to be upstreamed to U-Boot first) that allow use of 00e08000 >> > instead. >> > >> > Tom, Simon, what are your thoughts here? >> >> I was going to say the same thing. > > Okay, I can integrate that into the second version. Or would you prefer a > separate patch?
Yes a separate patch would be better, please. Thanks, Simon > > Thierry > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
