On 11/24/11 10:57 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
@@ -206,11 +206,28 @@ _start: RVECENT(romReserved,125) RVECENT(romReserved,126) RVECENT(romReserved,127) + XVECENT(romExcHandle,0x400); + RVECENT(romReserved,129); + RVECENT(romReserved,130); + RVECENT(romReserved,131); + RVECENT(romReserved,132); + RVECENT(romReserved,133); + RVECENT(romReserved,134); + RVECENT(romReserved,135); + RVECENT(romReserved,136); + RVECENT(romReserved,137); + RVECENT(romReserved,138); + RVECENT(romReserved,139); + RVECENT(romReserved,140); + RVECENT(romReserved,141); + RVECENT(romReserved,142); + RVECENT(romReserved,143); + XVECENT(romExcHandle,0x480); # bfc00480: EJTAG debug exception/* * We hope there are no more reserved vectors! - * 128 * 8 == 1024 == 0x400 - * so this is address R_VEC+0x400 == 0xbfc00400 + * 144 * 8 == 1152 == 0x480 + * so this is address R_VEC+0x480 == 0xbfc00480 */ .align 4 reset:
IIUC those exception vectors of +0x400/+0x480 have nothing to do with 24K processor core nor 34K either. The change itself is Ok, and any other version taking Marek's comment into account is also welcome. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
