On 12/05/2011 03:18 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 12/05/2011 04:11 PM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> wrote: >>> My point is that there are probably .dts files using "ok" instead of >>> "okay" or the kernel wouldn't support "ok". People will probably want to >>> use those with U-Boot without changing anything else. So, U-Boot should >>> interpret the FDT in the same way as the kernel. > > The kernel has to deal with real Open Firmware systems, some of which > pass buggy trees. U-Boot should not blindly imitate all of Linux's > workarounds.
If it's certain that we'll never see anyone writing FDTs with "ok" in them instead of "okay" (because such FDTs were only autogenerated by Open Firmware), then I'm fine with the original code. >> OK, how about: >> return 0 == strncmp(cell, "ok", 2); >> >> (I do feel that if you do this sort of thing you end up with people >> using 'ok' even in new fdts, since they look at code like this and >> think it is fine) That'd be buggy since it'd allow a lot more than ok/okay. A comment in the code would avoid the issue. -- nvpublic _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
