Dear Doug Anderson,

In message <1326231380-30128-1-git-send-email-diand...@chromium.org> you wrote:
> 
> As discussed previously on the U-Boot mailing list (see comments on
> "Fix fixup_silent_linux() buffer overrun" patchset), relying on

Please provide a link.

> "bootm" to mangle the Linux bootargs is not a suggested way to go.

So what is "a suggested way to go" to silence the Linux kenrel
messages?

> We now officially deprecate it and provide a way to avoid it (but
> still get the other CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE behavior).

You are removing functionality that is in active use by a number of
boards, without providing any replacement, i. e. you are breaking a
number of boards.

Do you think this is a good idea?

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to