Dear Wolfgang Denk, On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Wolfgang Denk <w...@denx.de> wrote: > You should do so in the commit mesage (but judging from my current > state of mind you can save the efforts for a v4).
Got it. If we end up with a v4, I'll add it. > I just replied to one of your earlier patches that did not fix the > overflow, but just shifted it to happen later, in Linux. I just responded to that one. ...but to reiterate here: I'm happy to add a CONFIG option to u-boot to allow setting the command line length (so I can use the 1024 bytes I have available to me in ARM) and also to avoid the buffer overrun. If this is the approach you'd like me to go, I'm happy to do it. > But this does the very same, just in a different way (requiring more > code). And it does not prevent the overflow at all. Sorry, I must have misunderstood your earlier suggestions back in October. My apologies there. :( _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot