On 26.04.2012 12:57, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: ... > On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:01:48 +0300 "Timo Ketola" <t...@exertus.fi> > wrote: ... >> What if I implement the driver in my board folder instead? ... > I would prefer not including the driver in the board code. The > disadvantage of using the video API is increased code size. If you do > not need the framebuffer console, then using the LCD interface is > okay.
Then I might resubmit the original patch. Is there basically anything else than the lack of proper attributions? ... > If you are going to update and resubmit your mx2fb patch, then > please base your work on the u-boot-samsung tree [1] as there are > another lcd driver changes in this tree. Or wait until samsung tree > will be merged and then rebase your work on top of u-boot tree. OK -- Timo _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
