Sorry, forgot to add something.

On 10/1/26 5:35 PM, Quentin Schulz wrote:
Hi Milivoje,

On 10/1/26 12:28 AM, Milivoje Legenovic wrote:
[You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

Hello everyone,

Here are the details of my analysis:
The commit that introduced the change in behavior in version 2026.01
is this one:

commit 209bbc4e0032228c6ea17e2172a8a6b89756c4f5
Author: Adriana Nicolae <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Nov 27 08:28:34 2025 -0800

     boot/bootfdt: Add smbios3-entrypoint to FDT for non-EFI boots

     The Linux kernel can discover SMBIOS tables through two primary methods:
     1. Via EFI tables, when using EFI boot;
     2. Via the 'smbios3-entrypoint' property in the /chosen node of the
     device tree.
...

I found this out by comparing the device tree from a working version,
decompiled using

sudo dtc -I fs -O dts /sys/firmware/devicetree/base -o live_tree.dts

and difference was in /chosen node:

chosen {
         u-boot,version =
"2026.01_armbian-2026.01-S127a-P7283-Hee1c-V2928-B3a7f-R448a";
         linux,initrd-end = <0x00 0xecbffca5>;
         bootargs = ...
         smbios3-entrypoint = <0x00 0xedf47000>;
         kaslr-seed = <0x00 0x00>;
         linux,initrd-start = <0x00 0xeb519000>;
         stdout-path = "serial2:1500000n8";
};

In 2026.01 version smbios3-entrypoint was there, in 2025.10 not. I
searched for this term in git history and found the commit mentioned
above.
With git show I saw what activates this, and made a patch in armbian
build system to disable it and confirm it fixes the problem. And it
fixed it.



Can you run a bisect between 2025.10 and 2026.01 without a change to the defconfig? I'm pretty sure this commit is not the issue (you can revert it and keep CONFIG_GENERATE_SMBIOS_TABLE enabled and you'll likely see behavior hasn't changed, meaning the breaking change is coming from another commit). After a glance at the log between 2025.10 and 2026.01, I don't see anything obviously related to smbios that changed (aside from the commit you mentioned and 2d226a735e0e ("smbios: Fix warning when building with clang") but that isn't a clear candidate for a breakage of this kind).

As far as my understanding goes, there's actually nothing consuming this DT property right now. There is a patch on the Linux kernel mailing list, c.f. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251031115917.713105-2- [email protected]/ but it's not merged. I doubt Armbian would backport this but maybe they did? So I don't think the *presence* of this property changes anything, but there could be side-effects (e.g. actually having the SMBIOS3 table somewhere it isn't expected, potentially corrupting e.g. the kernel). I'm a bit skeptical though as the commit you point to only adds a property, it doesn't seem to be doing anything else.

Here is also where kernel hangs for 60 seconds (always at the same place):

[   14.482048] calling  gpio_led_driver_init+0x0/0x38 @ 1
[   78.137967] Freeing initrd memory: 23448K
[   78.165027] probe of leds returned 0 after 63677665 usecs
[   78.166792] initcall gpio_led_driver_init+0x0/0x38 returned 0 after
63684076 usecs


So the probe of the drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c driver took 60+seconds, that seems quite improbable (well, it technically could be anything on the path for this driver to probe, c.f. really_probe() in drivers/base/ dd.c.

Can you disable that driver (CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO) and see if it goes further? Being curious :) (I see Armbian did some - clearly downstream - changes to this driver, so being curious :) ).

Can you provide us with a link (with commit hash) to the exact sources of U-Boot and Linux kernel that Armbian builds for your board?

Can you provide us with the full bootlog (including U-Boot up until the Linux kernel's hung)?

As you can see, I was only able to find the cause, but that’s the
extent of my expertise.

At first, I wanted to sort out the problem with a patch in the Armbian
build project, but then I thought: "Why not sort it out at source?"


I'm not convinced we're there yet but that's the kind of spirit I like, let's not fix symptoms or consequences :)

Cheers,
Quentin

Reply via email to