I seem to recall after doing some playing with sockets awhile back that you can pass the handle to a subroutine?
The one downside that I can think of with having UV being the socket handling, is if the site can pounded, it could slow down UV, whereas if a webserver get's maxed out, it shouldn't affect UV (key word - shouldn't) George >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Simon Lewington >Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:42 AM >To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org >Subject: Re: [U2] Universe to Web interface > > >>> >> > here is the appropriate manual : >> > http://publibfi.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/25119080.pdf > >You most definitely *cannot* pass a UV socket handle to >another UV process. > >Simon ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
