I'm still having quivers about last week's threads about trying to cut corners by using PE in an "inquiry-only", "depends on the definition of the word 'commercial'", Clintonian-like rationalizations.
I was simply using your comments as a spring-board, not accusing you of suggesting they do that. David's comments are a good reminder why we
--> need to trim replies and not quote the entire message <--
Now, as to the original question, I agree. Running UV on SUSE uncertified, would be, um, "unadvisable." While the PE version may look like it worked, your comments about (paraphrased), 'what happens if it croaks in production' are straight to the point.
To qoute the movie Ghost Busters, "who ya gonna call?"
--
Regards,
Clif
Adrian Matthews wrote:
I didn't mean use the PE version. I was stating that I've used the PE version on other distros of Linux.
What I meant was it would be foolish to run a commercial version of Universe on an unsupported platform.
Sorry for the obvious confusion.
------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
