Charles, I think your reply demonstrates my point. Here I will help you look back, didn't have to look far, most of his posts are in the same format.
george r smith Post from Tony G on 08/29 >I've been doing communications work with MV for many years I believe mv.NET >is the best software in its class. In short, it's backed by a great >company that is constantly improving it, support is great, the price is >reasonable, it's cross-MV platform, the "experience" of using it for daily ><development is excellent and comfortable, and the quality is excellent. >We don't like it because we sell it, we sell it because we like it, and >when my clients and colleagues finally take a look at it they almost >inevitably adopt it. Even IBM has purchased a license to maintain their >own version of mv.NET. What more do we want from the tools we use these >days? I'll be happy to discuss this with anyone who is interested. > George, > I'll have to look back. i do try my best to be even handed, but I am > certainly not perfect. > How about it Tony? Have I missed chances to cyber-spank you? > > - Chuck > > George R Smith wrote: > > Charles, > > > > I have no connection to David BUT why don't you require Tony G to have > an AD > > /AD around most if not all his posts - all they are just solitations for > > business. > ------- > u2-users mailing list > u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ------- u2-users mailing list u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
