Anthony Youngman skrev:
> I think you're muddling dynamic and dimensioned arrays - a dynamic array
> can't have an element 0 :-)
>
Blushing: yes I did.
-- mats
> Sounds like somebody, when writing jBase, saw the "feature" of <-1> and
> thought they'd be clever with <0>.
>
> Cheers,
> Wol
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mats Carlid
> Sent: 19 August 2008 14:53
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] Dynamic Array oddity very useful
>
> That is then flavour dependent - in information flavour there
> is a zero element , that's where the overflowing elements go
> ( if any) in a matparse.
>
> -- mats
>
> Martin Phillips skrev:
>
>> Hi Dennis,
>>
>>
>>> So A<0> = X is a way quicker way of writing A = X : @fm : A
>>>
>> I'm not sure that this is a safe assumption. I have taken a quick look
>> at the documentation for various mv products and they tend not to
>> define what will happen.
>>
>> Trying your example with UV does not produce the result that you quote.
>>
>> I think that the real issue here is that there is no field zero. It is
>> up to the different products to determine what they do in this case as
>> there doesn't appear to be an agreed behaviour.
>>
> -------
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
> -------
> u2-users mailing list
> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
-------
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
