Doesn't the umask have to be the inverse (for want of a better word)? umask 002 would give the same permisions as chmod 664? Or is that something that has been changed?
Bruce M Neylon Health Care Management Group "Joshua Gallant" <jgall...@cbd.com> Sent by: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 06/16/2009 12:57 PM Please respond to U2 Users List <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> To "U2 Users List" <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org> cc Subject Re: [U2] Linux / file create default permissions You do in fact want to look into the umask setting but 770 doesn’t seem correct since that would grant access to “other” but not the owner or group. - Josh From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Schasny Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:20 PM To: sjos...@sjplus.com; U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] Linux / file create default permissions Set the users umask in the .profile of their home directory. If all of your users are part of a common group (as they should be) umask 770 should work Susan Joslyn wrote: Greetings group. Anyone know how to set an overall parameter so that files created in Universe over Linux get r/w/x permissions? We are having to chmod 777 after we create any file… want that to be the default. Thanks! Susan Joslyn SJ+ Systems Associates, Inc. PRC(r) Software life-cycle management and IT Governance for U2/Multivalue http://sjplus.com _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- Jeff Schasny - Denver, Co, USA jschasny at gmail dot com _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
_______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
