Is the SP-ASSIGN command that different in UV or is this just flavor
dependant? We have an SP-ASSIGN and we are in Reality flavor.

Jerry Banker

-----Original Message-----
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Dianne Ackerman
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 9:23 AM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Converting from mvBase to Universe

We actually wrote our own subroutine SP-ASSIGN so that all embedded 
SP-ASSIGN commands within basic programs don't need to change - they 
just use our subroutine which calls SETPTR with appropriate commands.
-Dianne

Dave Taylor wrote:
> Hi Curt,
>
> We have migrated the software on a number of systems from mvBase to 
> Universe running on both Windows and Linux.
>
> The good news is that the Pick-flavored account on Universe is very 
> close to mvBase.
>
> Also good news is that Universe has two file types - type 1 and type 
> 19 - that are both directory-type files: ie. the Universe file  is a 
> Linux directory/Windows folder and each item in the Universe file is a 
> Linux/Windows file in that directory/folder.
>
> When a record is written to the Universe file, all the Attr. marks are 
> converted to CRLF sequences and then converted back when it is read by 
> Universe, so the records can even be edited with Notepad from ouside 
> Universe if you wish.
>
> This means that you can strip out all the U-statements in mvBase code, 
> define your OS-level file as a type 19 file in Universe (supports long 
> file name compared with the type 1 file) and OPEN, READ, WRITE, etc. 
> directly to/from it just like you do with any other Universe file.
>
> In our EDI translator, we use the U-statements in mvBase extensively 
> in reading/writing EDI documents to/from the database to OS-level 
> files for automatic transfer to/from other computers and all the 
> U-statements have been stripped out and replaced with normal OPEN, 
> READ, WRITE statements to/from type 19 files in the Universe version 
> of the product.
>
> The only significant difference between mvBase (and all other generic 
> Pick databases for that matter) and Universe is that Universe does not 
> support the generic Pick print spooler for assigning user print output 
> to a queue and assigning a printer to the same queue to enable the 
> printing of the print job to the printer, and all the other features 
> of holding and spooling print jobs to selected printers.
>
> None of the generic Pick print spooler commands are available to 
> perform those functions - eg STARTSPOOLER, STARTPTR, SP-ASSIGN, 
> LISTPEQS, SP-EDIT, etc.
>
> So all embedded SP-ASSIGN commands have to be converted to SETPTR 
> commands, new print procedures have to be developed and all users have 
> to be retrained in using a much less robust print architecture than 
> they're used to using.
>
> <AD> To bridge this gap in functionality, we developed SpoolerPlus, a 
> generic Pick print spooler, that runs on Universe, Unidata and QM, to 
> provide the generic Pick print spooler commands and functionality 
> built into software migrated from generic Pick databases.
>
> I will be pleased to send you some infomation about SpoolerPlus if you 
> wish.</AD>.
>
> Also, please feel free to ask any specific questions about minor 
> differences between mvBase and Universe and I'll be glad to answer 
> them if I can.
>
> Best wishes for a successful conversion,
>
> Dave
>
> Dave Taylor
> Sysmark Information Systems, Inc.
> Authorized IBM Business Partner
> 49 Aspen Way
> Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274
> (O) 800-SYSMARK (800-797-6275)
> (F) 310-377-3550
> (C) 310-561-5200
> www.sysmarkinfo.com
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Curt Stewart" 
> <cstewa...@earthlink.net>
> To: <u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org>
> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 2:43 PM
> Subject: [U2] Converting from mvBase to Universe
>
>
>> I have a client that is considering moving from an mvBase system to a
>> Universe (Windows) system.  A lot of their processes are tied to 
>> specific
>> ports and ranges.  Is there an easy solution in Universe to "nail" the
>> telnet ports for the users?
>>
>> Also, they use UREAD and UWRITE and take advantage of the MVClients 
>> ability
>> to read and write to the local workstation, instead of the server 
>> when not
>> using MVClient.  I haven't heard of this separation being available in
>> Universe, other than using something like Accuterm, am I right? Or is 
>> there
>> an easy way to distinguish between writing to the local drive vs. the
>> server?  How has others handled this conversion issue?  Right now we're
>> planning on assigning each user a directory on the server to write 
>> to, does
>> anyone have any alternate ideas?
>>
>> Thanks for the help, I appreciate hearing your solutions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Curt
>> TRI-SYS Consulting
>>
>> u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> U2-Users mailing list
>> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
>> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users 
>
> _______________________________________________
> U2-Users mailing list
> U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
> http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
>
>

_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

_______________________________________________
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

Reply via email to