There is an overhead in using the transaction handling capability in UV [Assume same would be the case in UD] in the an underlying transaction structure is established in memory and the transaction mechanism also it enforces some constraints such as record locking [ Which you should do anyway ].
It would be better if a TRY CATCH mechanism was added specifically.... My 2c worth... > -----Original Message----- > From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users- > boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Glorfield, Gordon > Sent: Friday, 11 February 2011 11:01 a.m. > To: 'U2 Users List' > Subject: Re: [U2] Does UV have a "BLOCK" command > > I've been following this thread somewhat cursorily. But I've not seen a > mention by anyone of the built in transaction handling in U2. I'm speaking > about the TRANSACTION START THEN END construct with > TRANSACTION.COMMIT and TRANSACTION.ABORT commands. This would > seem to fit the bill of the original poster. > > Just my 2 cents, > Gordon > > Gordon J Glorfield | Software Application Developer | Vertis > Communications > 250 W. Pratt Street, Suite 1800 | Baltimore, MD, 21201 T 410-361-8664 | M > 443-280-7093 gglorfi...@vertisinc.com | http://www.vertisinc.com > > [snip] > _______________________________________________ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
