> From: David Jordan > From my observations, I don't quite agree on Tony's > summation of Cache vs U2.
You are of course welcome to disagree, and I might even agree with some of your points. But several of your points disagree with statements that I didn't make. Rather than go through each in detail I'll leave to anyone who cares to simply eliminate what I didn't say from your disagreement. I wasn't really making a summation either, other than I believe Caché is worthy of investigation. I tried to open and close with a basic comparison, but tried to focus around the specific inquiry of the OP. In other words, there are a lot of right and wrong things about both U2 and Caché, Rocket and ISC, but that's not the question that was asked so I didn't elaborate beyond the inquiry. Finally, WRT "Honestly the PICK issue does not come up as much as people think it does, nor is it a hindrance." We're obviously working in different circles because I get inquiries about this almost every day, probably because this is what I do for a living. People call me because they need to make decisions about whether to keep MV or migrate away, add a GUI or integrate with some other environment that has one. IT managers ask what they can do quickly and with a low budget to get the new VPs off their back about getting rid of the DOS system. Company managers call me to ask why they can't find Pick people with RDBMS and Java/.NET experience. Programmers send me résumés because their company is migrating away from Pick. Of all the issues in this market that people pretend don't exist, let's not ignore one of the most major threats that we face. Rather, I'll accept that YOU don't see this, but please don't doubt that this IS a huge problem. T _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
