I tried to respond a while ago, but my message came back with "The
message's content type was not explicitly allowed". I'll try a different
cut-and-paste approach. Hopefully this isn't a duplicate for anybody....
<snip>
> "Susan Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Thanks - I just looked at CTLGTB and there is an entry there for both.
>
>EDIT-LIST looks like this:
>
>M
>0
>@UDTHOME/SYS_BP EDIT-LIST
>root
>
>EDIT.LIST looks the same, but has EDIT.LIST instead of EDIT-LIST.
>
>In UDTHOME, we have a sys directory, which contains a SYS_BP file, which
contains EDIT.LIST and EDIT_LIST, not EDIT-LIST.
<snip>
Susan,
That all looks like what I'm seeing on a system here, and both EDIT-LIST
and EDIT.LIST work fine. What platform, UDT release, etc. are you working
with?
Just for giggles, it may be interesting to create a synonym VOC entry for
EDIT-LIST that looks like this:
1: S
2: EDIT.LIST
If that works, it may help track this down.
Tim Snyder
IBM Data Management Solutions
Consulting I/T Specialist , U2 Professional Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
u2-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.oliver.com/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
